Data center profile · Kingsboro Business Park, near Tarboro, Edgecombe County, North Carolina

Kingsboro Campus (Energy Storage Solutions)

A 900 MW gas-powered, $19.2B data-center campus pitched for Edgecombe County, North Carolina (press, developer figures); the developer walked away in July 2026 and the county then froze approvals

Withdrawn, cancelled. Energy Storage Solutions ended its pursuit in July 2026 and the county voted to return its land deposit. The sale never closed and no air permit or utility agreement was filed. The county adopted a two-year moratorium Aug. 3, 2026.
The site, Satellite image, Oct. 31, 2025
900 MW
campus size claimed by the developer (press)
never split into IT capacity or generation; developer also spoke of 1,800 MW of generation for redundancy
$19.2B
project cost claimed by the developer
no financing was ever disclosed
21.55 + 100 acres
county land the developer sought: a purchase and an option
the purchase never closed; the option lapsed Feb. 3, 2026
July 6, 2026
county announces the developer has withdrawn
board votes to return the $17,500 deposit
OperatorEnergy Storage Solutions LLC (Rocky Mount, N.C.); land bought through its affiliate Goforth Solar LLC
CustomerNone named; tenants and financing were never disclosed
Planned IT capacity720 MW at full build-out (our estimate from the company's 0.9 GW campus power figure)
Next deadlineAug. 2028: County two-year moratorium on data-center approvals runs to about Aug. 2028
From orbit

The site from above

Satellite overview1
Satellite image, Oct. 31, 2025.
From orbit

The site

Satellite views of the same ground on May 9, 2010 and Oct. 31, 2025. Drag to compare. What we count on the Oct. 31, 2025 image:

after
before
◀ Aerial photo, May 9, 2010Satellite image, Oct. 31, 2025 ▶
Permits

Permits checklist

1 denied · 2 withdrawn · 1 granted · 2 checked, nothing on file

Approvals a campus like this normally needs, and what the record shows. The Tarboro denial concerns a separate 52-acre site on Anaconda Road, not the Kingsboro land.

Risks

Why it stopped, what could revive it

Lawsuits

1 case on record

Power

Power and the grid

None energized or contracted yet

On-site natural gas generation (behind the meter)Proposed, withdrawn
900 MW
campus figure from press; the split between IT capacity and generation was never stated; sponsor also cited overbuilding to 1,800 MW News report · Nov. 2025
Proposed
Other sources, size not disclosed
Not used, not on record, or dropped

Getting on the grid

Who supplies what, what it costs, and what is still not public.

  1. Nov. 5, 2025
    Plan announced
    A 900 MW, 300-acre campus is described in the press, powered by natural gas. News report · Nov. 2025
  2. As of Oct. 2026
    No air permit on file
    No state air-permit application for the planned gas plant was found. see Permits
  3. As of Oct. 2026
    No utility agreement
    No electric service, interconnection or surplus-power sale agreement was ever executed; the buyer of surplus power was never named. News report · Oct. 2026
  4. Not set
    Gas supply: not signed
    Piedmont Natural Gas is named in application materials, but no supply agreement is on record. News report · Sept. 2025
Money

Money on record

$19.2B
project cost claimed by the developer
no lender or investor ever named News report · Nov. 2025
$350,000
offered for 21.55 acres of county land
$17,500 deposit, later returned; closing was due by Nov. 20, 2025 Local government · Oct. 2025
$1.65M
option price for the adjoining 100 acres
$5,000 option fee; option lapsed Feb. 3, 2026 Local government · Oct. 2025
$2.64M
state water-system grant to the county for the business park
site readiness for the whole park, not for this developer State agency · Oct. 2026
$75M a year
tax revenue the developer claimed at full build-out

Not on record: incentives granted to the developer: no local or state incentive agreement found State agency · Oct. 2026

Timeline

What happened, and what is due

SitePaper trailConstructionPowerPermitsMoneyLegalUpcoming
  1. Aug. 28, 2025
    Site Developer's affiliate offers $350,000 for county land at Kingsboro Business Park Local government · Oct. 2025
  2. Sept. 2, 2025
    Permits County commissioners accept the land offer Local government · Sept. 2025
  3. Sept. 8, 2025
    Permits Tarboro council denies the developer's permit for a separate Anaconda Road site Local government · Sept. 2025
  4. Nov. 3, 2025
    Permits County adds data centers as an allowed use in industrial zones News report · Nov. 2025
  5. Nov. 5, 2025
    Site Developer announces a 900 MW, $19.2B campus with groundbreaking planned for early 2026 (press) News report · Nov. 2025
  6. Dec. 1, 2025
    Site Dozens of residents ask commissioners to reject the land sale News report · Dec. 2025
  7. Feb. 3, 2026
    Site County demands proof of funding; the land option lapses the same day Local government · Feb. 2026
  8. June 22, 2026
    Site County survey shows 82.8% of 372 respondents oppose any data center; advisory group backs a ban on 100 MW+ sites Local government · June 2026
  9. July 6, 2026
    Site County announces the developer has withdrawn; board returns the deposit News report · July 2026
  10. Aug. 3, 2026
    Permits County adopts a two-year moratorium on data-center approvals News report · Aug. 2026
  11. Aug. 2028
    Permits Moratorium runs out unless extended News report · Aug. 2026
Construction activity

Satellite captures by quarter

Since May 2010: 75 satellite captures. The chart starts in the first quarter of 2023; 8 earlier records are not drawn.

Satellite
’23
’24
’25
’26
Dot size: records in the quarter, largest = 6. Two-digit years mark each first quarter.
The buildings

Specs

300 acres
campus size claimed (press); the county land at issue was 121.55 acres
500,000 gallons a day
water use the company indicated to the county
1,000+ jobs
claimed by the developer (press); 500 cited to the town in 2025
24 phases
over 3 to 5 years, per the developer (press)
Who is involved

Owners, partners and builders

Owners and developers
  • Energy Storage Solutions LLC: developer; president Daniel Shaffer
  • Goforth Solar LLC: affiliate that held the land offer and option
  • North Carolina Renewable Energy LLC: related entity
Decision-makers
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: landowner and moratorium authority
  • Town of Tarboro Town Council: denied the Anaconda Road permit
Power
  • Piedmont Natural Gas: named gas supplier, no agreement
  • Edgecombe-Martin County EMC: local electric cooperative, no agreement
Opponents
  • NC Environmental Justice Network and Edgecombe County Neighbors
Still unknown

Open questions

Where this comes from

336 records from 29 documents

Drawn from news reports, public and commercial datasets, local government records, state agency records, our own analysis, securities filings, company statements and satellite captures, each kept with its date and source. The bar shows documents by type.

News report 12Dataset 7Local government 6State agency 4Analysis 2SEC filing 2Company 1Satellite 0
Evidence

Every quote behind this page

Grade key: A = the primary record itself (permit, filing, exhibit) · B = a dated official statement · C = news reporting. Map distances are our own measurements on OpenStreetMap and carry no grade. Allegations in lawsuits are marked as such in the quotes.

Power (24)
  • Utility service: not stated
    “Though you plan to generate your own electricity, do you anticipate connecting to the grid for power back-up? If so, what will the electrical demand be at full build-out”
  • Utility: none contracted
    “While we await documentation confirming proof of funding for your proposed project, the County's role remains focused on evaluating whether such a sale would serve the public interest”
  • Site: Kingsboro Business Park (Kingsboro CSX Select Site megasite), end of QVC Blvd, behind the former QVC facility
    “an offer to purchase was received from Goforth Solar, LLC to purchase property the County owns at Kingsboro Business Park located behind the former QVC facility”
  • Megasite acres: 1449 acres
    “The Kingsboro CSX Select Site is a 1,449 acre site”
  • Utility: none contracted (no utility service agreement found)
    “none contracted (no utility service agreement found; the surplus-sale counterparty was never named)”
    grade B
  • Nearest gas pipeline: 0.24 km
    Measured on OpenStreetMap map data.
  • Natron Energy's $1.4B sodium-ion battery gigafactory was announced for the same Kingsboro megasite in Aug 2024 and was the first Megasite Readiness Program funds recipient - a different project and sponsor; megasite mone
    “Natron is the first recipient of Megasite Readiness Program funds, which are subject to final approval from the EDPNC's Board of Directors”
  • ESS's earlier pitch at the same business park: a Tarboro Business Park & Local Utilities BESS proposal (50/100/200 MWac storage systems for Rocky Mount, Edgecombe-Martin Coop and Tarboro Electric; $1.29B estimated total
    “Tarboro Business Park & Local Utilities: An Estimated 1.29 Billion Dollar Battery Energy Storage (BESS) Project”
  • IT capacity: not stated
    “Reports on the total planned size and power capacity of the site vary, with some suggesting total capacity of 900MW”
  • On-site generation: not stated
    “An on-site natural gas power generation will allow the company to sell surplus power back to local utilities at a discount”
  • Nearest power line of 345 kV or more: none mapped within 16 km
    Measured on OpenStreetMap map data.
  • Nearest substation of 345 kV or more: none verifiable within 16 km
    Measured on OpenStreetMap map data.
  • State-level backdrop: NC House passed the Ratepayer Protection Act (data center developers to cover grid expansion costs), pending in the Senate - not a factor in the county record for this campus
    “The legislation includes provisions requiring data center developers to cover the upfront costs for grid expansion, transmission upgrades, and new power generation”
  • Aliases: Kingsboro NetZero Data Center Campus; Kingsboro megasite project
    “Blueprint for Energy Storage Solution's proposed Kingsboro NetZero Data Center Campus”
  • Acres claimed campus: 300 acres
    “a massive 900 MW, 300-acre data center and energy storage campus in eastern North Carolina”
  • Stated campus size: 900 MW
    “A North Carolina data center developer's plan to build a massive 900 MW, 300-acre data center and energy storage campus”
  • Power plan: onsite (behind-the-meter)
    “The company will use natural gas to power the site”
  • Site acres: 300 acres
    “A North Carolina data center developer’s plan to build a massive 900 MW, 300-acre data center and energy storage campus in eastern North Carolina”
  • Stated campus size: 900 MW
    “plan to build a massive 900 MW, 300-acre data center and energy storage campus”
  • Interconnection status: None - project withdrawn July 6, 2026 before any utility position existed: no electric service agreement, interconnection study or NCUC docket naming the Kingsboro campus was ever located, and the
    “An on-site natural gas power generation will allow the company to sell surplus power back to local utilities at a discount.”
  • Jobs claimed: 500 jobs
    “Project principals clarified the proposal is for a data center that would include on-site power generation using natural gas and carbon-capture equipment and that the proposal could create up to 500 jobs”
  • Announced: Sept. 2, 2025
    “staff clarified the proposed development is a data center that would generate on-site power from natural gas and include carbon-capture equipment; it is not a solar project”
  • On-site power technology: natural gas generation; BESS; claimed CO2 capture (carbon sponge / green sequestration)
    “We will use a carbon sponge clean energy system to capture the CO2 and other emissions as a green sequestration system”
  • Sponsor spoke of overbuilding generation to 1,800 MW for redundancy (project sponsors file summary of sponsor statements); no OEM, turbine order or slot reservation was ever evidenced
    “Sponsor said it was principally looking at natural gas with on-site turbines plus battery storage and spoke of overbuilding to 1,800 MW for redundancy”
    grade C
Money and contracts (30)
  • Land control: Edgecombe County owned the land throughout; Goforth Solar LLC held a purchase agreement (21.55 ac) and an option (100 ac) from Oct 2025; closing never evidenced, option lapsed Feb 3 2026, deposit voted retu
    “the County is the owner in fee simple of certain real property being 100 acres, more or less, identified as Tax Parcel No. 3789-64-7138-00”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: status Never closed on the record assembled: county manager's Feb 3 2026 letter states the Board had not made a decision regarding the potential sale and awaited proof of funding; option
    “the Board of Commissioners has not made a decision regarding the potential sale of County-owned property for this project”
  • Financing: none disclosed; investors/backers never named; proof of funding requested by the county and outstanding as of Feb 3 2026
    “While we await documentation confirming proof of funding for your proposed project”
  • Acres option: 100 acres
    “The offer included $5,000 for an option to purchase the adjoining property consisting of 100 acres (3789-64-7138) at a price of $1,650,000”
  • Announced: Aug. 28, 2025
    “Buyer made an offer on August 28, 2025 to purchase the Phase One Property from the County for the amount of $350,000.00”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: scope Phase One Property, 21.55 acres, Tax Parcel 3789-47-5019-00, Kingsboro Business Park
    “Buyer agrees to purchase from the County and the County agrees to sell to Buyer the Phase One Property”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: purchase price 350000 USD
    “The purchase price for the Phase One Property is Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and NO/100 ($350,000.00)”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: deposit 17500 USD
    “Buyer made an offer on August 28, 2025 to purchase the Phase One Property from the County for the amount of $350,000.00 and paid to the County a deposit of $17,500.00”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: condition Closing on or before November 20, 2025; deposit credited at closing; county to deliver special warranty deed
    “Closing shall occur on a date mutually selected by the Parties on or before November 20, 2025”
  • land purchase and sale agreement (option): scope Option to purchase Phase Two Property, 100 acres, Tax Parcel 3789-64-7138-00
    “The County acknowledges receipt of Buyer's option fee of $5,000.00 and agrees to grant Buyer an option to purchase the Phase Two Property for $1,650,000.00”
  • land purchase and sale agreement (option): option fee 5000 USD
    “The offer included $5,000 for an option to purchase the adjoining property consisting of 100 acres”
  • land purchase and sale agreement (option): condition Option exercisable on or before February 3, 2026; exercise requires written notice plus a further 5% deposit of $82,500 and a new negotiated-offer (upset bid) round be
    “Buyer may exercise the Option by notifying the County in writing addressed to Eric Evans, County Manager and by depositing with the County five percent of the Phase Two Purchase Price, which amount is $82,500.00”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: condition Buyer's closing obligations conditioned on satisfactory surveys/tests, county representations true at closing, and a preliminary title binder (Section 8)
    “The obligation of Buyer to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby is subject to the fulfillment of all the following conditions”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: termination Buyer may terminate if title examination discloses defects that cannot be cured to the satisfaction of Buyer's attorney within a reasonable period (Section 10)
    “at Buyer's option, all rights and obligations created hereunder may be terminated”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: termination Buyer may terminate if the Phase One Property becomes subject to condemnation before closing and Buyer deems the remainder unsuitable; all consideration paid is refunded (Sec
    “Buyer shall have the option to terminate this Agreement and all consideration paid for this Agreement by Buyer to the County will be refunded to Buyer”
  • land purchase and sale agreement: missing clause finding Finding: the agreement as attached contains no development deadline, no jobs floor, no clawback, no proof-of-funding condition and no general termination-for-conve
    “This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the option and the purchase and sale of the Property”
  • Incentives: none granted to ESS or Goforth Solar; no incentive agreement found
    “Edgecombe County received assistance of $2,637,650 through the Megasite Readiness Program to provide significant public water system upgrades that will directly serve Kingsboro Business Park”
  • incentive agreement: missing agreement finding Finding: no local or state incentive agreement (JDIG, abatement, grant) for the data center was ever adopted; public funds at Kingsboro went to site readiness only
    “Edgecombe County received assistance of $2,637,650 through the Megasite Readiness Program”
  • Megasite readiness money is site-level and continues independent of ESS: $2,637,650 state award to Edgecombe County for the Kingsboro Hwy 64 booster pump station (grant project ordinance approved by the county Apr 6 2026
    “these improvements will include the replacement and increased capacity of the existing booster pump station located adjacent to the park”
  • Original target date: not stated
    “expects to break ground on the $19.2 billion project in the first quarter of 2026”
  • Tenant status: not stated
    “Financing and potential tenants for the project were never publicly disclosed”
  • electric service agreement: missing agreement finding Finding: no electric service agreement, interconnection agreement or surplus-power sale agreement with any utility was ever executed or filed; the surplus-sale counte
    “An on-site natural gas power generation will allow the company to sell surplus power back to local utilities at a discount”
  • Sponsor's stated reason for walking: investors insisted on moving to friendlier communities after delays and backlash; no financing had ever been disclosed and proof of funding demanded by the county in Feb 2026 was neve
    “investors insisted that we move forward with other projects that we have in friendlier communities”
  • Tenants: none (never named)
    “The developers haven't released the prospective tenants' names for the data center. The number of permanent jobs will depend on those tenants”
  • Tax revenue claimed: 75000000 USD/year
    “Once we build out our $19.2 billion project, the campus as a whole, the number is going to be about $75 million annually”
  • Name: Kingsboro Campus
    “expect to break ground on the $19.2 billion project in the Kingsboro development in Tarboro, N.C.”
  • Stated capital cost: 19200000000 USD
    “expects to break ground on the $19.2 billion project in the Kingsboro development in Tarboro, N.C., in the first quarter of 2026”
  • Energy infrastructure claimed: 176000000 USD
    “Shaffer estimates the company could pay for $176 million in energy infrastructure upgrades in the area”
  • Groundbreaking claimed: Q1 2026 (claimed; never happened)
    “the company expects to break ground on the $19.2 billion project in the Kingsboro development in Tarboro, N.C., in the first quarter of 2026”
  • Twin-campus claim: a second, identically scaled campus in Fayetteville, NC; combined $38B claimed for the two campuses; investors and vendors never named (separate campus - do not merge)
    “A twin project is also planned for Fayetteville, N.C., Shaffer said”
Permits and government (25)
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners (special meeting): Data Center Advisory Group report; board calls public hearing on a 24-month data center moratorium
    “Present a report from the Data Center Advisory Group”
  • county development application: none pending
    “He also informed everyone that there has been an ad-hoc committee formed and meeting regularly to package information to share at special called meeting on June 22, 2026”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: Public petitions against data centers; county manager status report
    “Mr. Evans clarified that there have not been any applications pending to be considered”
  • special use permit (written order): order adopted
    “Council adopted an order denying the Special Use Permit for Energy Storage Solutions”
  • Town of Tarboro Town Council: Adoption of written order denying Special Use Permit - Energy Storage Solutions
    “Sabrina Bynum made a motion, which was seconded by Cutchin Anderson and Passed motion. Ayes: Anderson Bynum Jordan Burnette Taylor and Pitt. Nayes: Brown”
  • special use permit: denied
    “Councilman Taylor made a motion, which was seconded by Councilman Pitt and passed by a 7 to 1 vote, that Council deny the application for the reasons listed above”
  • Town of Tarboro Town Council: Special Use Permit 25-02 evidentiary hearing (continued): ESS Data Center and Energy Storage System, 52.185 acres, Anaconda Road
    “Councilmember Jordan made a motion, which was seconded by Councilman Taylor and passed by a 7 to 1 vote, that Council consider the application not compliant with findings of fact”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: Acceptance of offer to purchase county-owned land (Attachment #5): Goforth Solar, LLC offer of $350,000 for 21.55 acres at Kingsboro Business Park plus option on 100 acres
    “D. Consideration of Acceptance of an Offer to Purchase County-owned Land (Attachment #5) A motion was made to accept offer as presented by Mr. Boswell and seconded by Dr. Powell; Motion: CARRIED”
  • Air permit status: No NC DEQ Division of Air Quality permit application found for North Carolina Renewable Energy LLC or the Kingsboro campus; no construction ever occurred at the site
    “17 ICIS-Air facilities within 5 mi returned by ECHO, incl; Sara Lee Frozen Bakery and Triangle Tyre (inactive)”
  • FAA airspace cases within 5 nautical miles: 18 cases
    “2026-ASO-1857-NRA Perimeter Fence - Phase 2 Fence 12 ft 35.93714722,-77.55385833 Determined - No Hazard”
    FAA · Oct. 2026 · grade B
  • air quality permit: none found
    “web searches on Duke Roxboro CC and Marshall CTs and Kingsboro and Amazon Richmond County”
    grade C
  • Moratoria: Edgecombe County two-year moratorium on data-center and crypto-mining development approvals, adopted and effective Aug 3 2026
    “the Board of Commissioners adopted an ordinance imposing a two-year moratorium on development approvals for data centers and crypto-mining operations effective Aug. 3, 2026”
  • Local moratorium: Edgecombe County adopted a two-year moratorium on data center and crypto-mining development approvals effective Aug. 3, 2026
    “the Board of Commissioners adopted an ordinance imposing a two-year moratorium on development approvals for data centers and crypto-mining operations effective Aug. 3, 2026”
  • moratorium ordinance: adopted
    “the Board of Commissioners adopted an ordinance imposing a two-year moratorium on development approvals for data centers and crypto-mining operations effective Aug. 3, 2026”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: Adoption of two-year moratorium on data-center and crypto-mining development approvals
    “Edgecombe County adopts 2-year moratorium on data-center and crypto-mining approvals”
  • Stage: cancelled
    “That project is officially off the table for consideration from the board”
  • Current target date: n/a - project withdrawn Jul 2026
    “Developer Energy Storage Solutions withdrew the project earlier this month, according to comments made by Edgecombe County manager Eric Evans at a county board of commissioners meeting on July 6”
  • Project status: cancelled - ESS withdrew the Kingsboro proposal; the county manager announced the withdrawal at the Jul 6, 2026 commissioners meeting and the board voted to return ESS’s deposit on the Kingsboro Business
    “A company that was interested in having a data center in the Kingsboro area of Edgecombe County has backed out, County Manager Eric Evans told the Board of Commissioners during its monthly meeting on July 6.”
  • ESS withdrew the Kingsboro proposal; the county manager announced the withdrawal at the July 6, 2026 commissioners meeting and the board voted to return ESS's deposit on the Kingsboro Business Park land. No utility filin
    “Developer Energy Storage Solutions withdrew the project earlier this month”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: County manager announces ESS withdrawal letter; board votes to return the land-purchase deposit; moratorium discussion
    “Evans told the commissioners that Energy Storage Solutions had put down a deposit on the offer to purchase. The commissioners, in response, voted to return the deposit”
  • certiorari appeal of SUP denial: filed; settlement reported; withdrawal expected
    “We believe we have reached a settlement with the town of Tarboro, and we expect to withdraw our lawsuit shortly, but ESS will not be building a data center there”
  • County Data Center Advisory Group ranked support for banning hyperscale (100 MW+) data centers; board then called the moratorium hearing - the political track that preceded the sponsor's July withdrawal
    “A county advisory group studying data centers recommended strong restrictions and, via ranked votes, showed top support for banning hyperscale (100 MW+) data centers”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: Public petitions opposing the proposed sale of roughly 122 acres in Kingsborough for the ESS data/energy project
    “Dozens of residents and regional advocates urged the Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners on Dec. 1 to reject or pause the sale of roughly 122 acres in Kingsborough”
  • zoning text amendment: adopted
    “The Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners voted Nov. 3 to amend the county's Unified Development Ordinance to add data centers and crypto-mining operations in M-2 zones”
  • Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners: UDO text amendment adding data centers and crypto-mining in M-2 with standards (60 dBA at property line, verification, utility-capacity demonstration)
    “voted Nov. 3, 2025 to adopt a text amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance that adds data centers and crypto-mining operations as permissible uses in the county's General Industrial (M-2) zoning district”
Site and other (19)
  • SEC filings: No SEC filing names the Kingsboro campus, sponsor Energy Storage Solutions LLC, or landowner North Carolina Renewable Energy, LLC; no filing records the project's status (the claimed Q1 2026 groundbreaking h
    “Form D search for "North Carolina Renewable Energy" returned 0 notices”
  • Water use stated: 500000 gallons/day
    “For the proposed Energy Storage System (ESS) project, the company has indicated a potential water use of up to 500,000 gallons per day”
  • Land owner today: Edgecombe County
    “It should be noted that nearly all land in the County currently zoned M-2 is owned by the County, with approximately 300 acres in private ownership”
  • Opposition: Sustained resident opposition: 200+ signature petition (Dec 2025), county survey of 372 residents with 82.8% opposed to any data center development; NC Environmental Justice Network and Edgecombe County Neigh
    “this refers to 82.8% of the 372 respondents to the County's online data center survey who selected I am opposed to any data center development in Edgecombe County”
  • County online survey: 372 respondents, 82.8% opposed to any data center development in Edgecombe County (0.63% of county population) - documented in the county advisory-group Q&A
    “82.8% of the 372 respondents to the County's online data center survey who selected I am opposed to any data center development in Edgecombe County”
  • Developer address: 4462 Meadowbrook Rd, Rocky Mount, NC 27801
    “Mr. Daniel Shaffer, Energy Storage Solutions, LLC, 4462 Meadowbrook Rd, Rocky Mount NC 27801”
  • Parcel IDs: 3789-47-5019-00 (Phase One); 3789-64-7138-00 (Phase Two)
    “being identified as Edgecombe County Tax Parcel No. 3789-47-5019-00 (the Phase One Property)”
  • Acres: 21.55 acres
    “Acreage: 21.55 acres”
  • County: Edgecombe County
    “Edgecombe County has the largest, shovel-ready mega-site in North Carolina”
  • County code: 37065
    “The Kingsboro CSX Select Site is a 1,449 acre site strategically located just off US Highway 64”
  • County code: 37065
    “reference anchor at the former QVC plant (35.921929,-77.676078): Edgecombe County NC (37065) per FCC point-in-county lookup; the business park parcels are in Edgecombe County”
  • Construction stage: not stated
    “the company expressed interest in purchasing a more than 20-acre parcel of land and in about a 100-acre parcel of land, that the company made an offer to buy”
  • Entitlement status: county commission approved land-use amendments unanimously at the end of 2025, but the land sale never closed; after the withdrawal the county enacted a two-year data-center moratorium (Aug 2026)
    “had secured unanimous approval at the end of last year from the county commission for land use amendments that would have allowed the project to go forward”
  • City: Tarboro (nearest town)
    “The project was planned for the Kingsboro development area near Tarboro”
  • Developer: Energy Storage Solutions LLC
    “Dan Shaffer, president of Energy Storage Solutions, based in Rocky Mount, N.C.”
  • Jobs claimed: 1000 jobs
    “each campus will support more than 1,000 employees”
  • Phases claimed: 24 phases over 3-5 years
    “The buildout at both the Kingsboro development and Fayetteville sites will come in 24 phases over 3-5 years”
  • Buildings claimed: about a dozen 40,000-square-foot structures
    “each campus will have about a dozen 40,000-square-foot structures”
  • Change.org petition against the Tarboro Anaconda Road facility passed 770 signatures during the SUP fight
    “A Change.org petition opposing the project has been launched and has garnered more than 770 signatures at the time of writing”

Imagery and records: Satellite and aerial imagery: Maxar and local aerial photography via Esri World Imagery Wayback.